The rec center that won't go away
First of all, I have to say that I am shocked that I have not received a single comment on yesterday's post about likely-upcoming layoffs in DPW, and the fact that there is not labor investigation in that department. Shocked.
But that's OK. Maybe some of the anonymous flamers have finally been cowed into silence by the truth of the situation. Anyway, one can hope.
I've just returned from a Planning Board meeting, at which the board considered one application -- the proposed indoor recreation center -- for nearly two hours. While it's great that the board is going to weigh in on the project, I was somewhat frustrated, that despite board chairman Clifford Van Wagner's best efforts, the conversation still devolved into the same well-trodden arguments for and against the rec center.
Now, this reporter gets to hear the same discussion at four meetings a month, rather than just two. Enough is enough. Lets make a decision on the thing already, nothing new is going to come out of further conversation.
The Planning Board also decided to hold their second meeting of the month next Thursday, as the regularly scheduled meeting would have occurred on Christmas Eve. I would have been there, but something tells me I would have been the only one.
But that's OK. Maybe some of the anonymous flamers have finally been cowed into silence by the truth of the situation. Anyway, one can hope.
I've just returned from a Planning Board meeting, at which the board considered one application -- the proposed indoor recreation center -- for nearly two hours. While it's great that the board is going to weigh in on the project, I was somewhat frustrated, that despite board chairman Clifford Van Wagner's best efforts, the conversation still devolved into the same well-trodden arguments for and against the rec center.
Now, this reporter gets to hear the same discussion at four meetings a month, rather than just two. Enough is enough. Lets make a decision on the thing already, nothing new is going to come out of further conversation.
The Planning Board also decided to hold their second meeting of the month next Thursday, as the regularly scheduled meeting would have occurred on Christmas Eve. I would have been there, but something tells me I would have been the only one.
2 Comments:
Maybe it's just wariness. What ever happened to the DEC investigation ?
And much like the news about the UCP position. There are two sides to the story...
No, the Rec. facility won't go away. And it shouldn't.
Why? Because the mayor scewed the process up from the get go. So now the economy is in the tank and he will not have the votes to award the construction contracts.
He was advised in writing in January and again in Jily of the corect SEQR process to follow, He was advised in writing of the application of the city zoning ordinance and the requirement for formal site plan review. At first he ignored the advice, then he denied it and now he finally has initiated
a review, as required, but he still hasn't got it right.
Had he followed staff advice in July, the facility would now be under construction. Makes you wonder where the city attorney has been.
At any rate, Johnson came into office with the money alteady bonded. Now, a year later essentially nothing is done because his office is over its head.
The deputy mayor had to ask a consultant what "SEQR" was. Look for litigation soon because the mayor dosen't know process and he's too arrogant to ask for help.
He'll bame others, but he has squandered the chance to get this project done because he refused to go about it the right way.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home